Or you can post a short clip taken from the files themselves. Or if you still have the files, open them with mediainfo, put it in text view, and post the info here. For example, the preset and quality value. I like XMedia Recode because it is one of the few software that works with external codecs that are extremely frequent as codec updates, in addition to offering a multitude of formats.I made a screenshot of the same video converted with both handbrake and xmedia recode I noticed by zooming in on the image that the xmedia recode image is more opaque and blurry, maybe I have to set some other settings to get a video quality similar to Handbrake? Best place to start is comparing the x264 settings within each program. However, it is a program for advanced users, who are already used to more advanced compression configurations, so anyone who is an atypical user may feel confused when configuring an output format.
Another point that bothers me is the "mysterious" crashes, which it has, depending on the output format to choose, the program simply closes without further explanation. Another point of improvement would be the use of filters, especially the part of changing resolutions, man!, it's a painful thing, upscale a video, for example, no matter how much you insert the resolution filter, and change the resolution values (for example I want to change a resolution from 720x540 to 960x720 being the movie, in 4:3 scale), the program just doesn't do it! Even avidemux, with its non-intuitive interface, directs you in an easier way, to change the resolution, and to insert the filters. But in the same way, I thank the developers, for the constant updates, and for the development of the project.Īs a user, I suggest developers to review the program's interface, I believe that, due to the range of possibilities, it is possible to integrate a program, with a slightly more friendly interface. I'll second that(review below)! Most of these converters based on ffmeg have deinterlace option but are quite useless in terms of none works that well, because it ruins a source video in terms off quality. Think back to older tools avi days of AutoGK, AviNET. Avi.NET would only have deinterlace option using decomb and was very crap at any source other than progressive! AutoGK could handle hybrid sources,ivtc Pure FILM etc quite well, but it could leave a few scenes with jagged edges, or in an interlaced source+ hybrid you might repeat scenes messing up more, so advanced users would use Gordian Knot to manipulate scripts and get a better outcome. Now for a long time Handbrake has used telecine and decomb. Keep these at default together and you would never have any of the problems mentioned.
Forget deinterlace even though Handbrake offers it.
0 kommentar(er)
